EECS 203 Mailing List
Re: HW Problem 2

Re: HW Problem 2

From: Jared Jenkins <jjenkins_at_avoiding.spam>
Date: Thu May 15 2008 - 23:08:23 CDT

Yes it does. Thanks.


On 5/15/08, Robert Dick <> wrote:
> Jared Jenkins:
> > Thats not what I meant, sorry. I meant the output (the LED lights) of the
> > machine is not a function of the inputs, just the state. I am really
> > wondering which inputs we need to look at for our transitions. For our
> lab
> > we only cared about the input M, but with this problem their three
> > variables L, R, and E or you can look at A and B. I am not sure which we
> > are supposed to look at for the state transitions.
> If you know your current output and your L, R, and E values, do you know
> what
> your next output should be? If so, you can figure out what your next state
> should be. The you can synthesize the state variables based on A and B or
> on
> L, R, and E. If you aren't sure what a particular next state variable
> should
> be a function of, just make it a function of all inputs and the current
> state
> variables. The K-Map will reduce it to the appropriate set of
> inputs. Does
> that answer the question?
> -Robert Dick-

Jared Michael Jenkins
Northwestern University
McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science
Web Development and IT Support Services
Mobile: 949.290.3737
Received on Thu May 15 23:08:23 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 23 2008 - 21:08:11 CDT